🔥 Hermes OpenAgent Dashboard

📋 任务 #t_1421ab60: Run forked Sisyphus UX audit and write the report

📦 所属项目: blog-app

🌳 omo 派了哪些助手 (1 次执行)

这里显示 omo 执行任务时的详细记录。如果任务复杂, omo 会派助手分工合作; 简单任务则自己搞定。

🤖 omo 正在做什么 (实时)

这是 omo (AI 助手) 当前正在执行的步骤。它会自动切换: 先看代码 → 写方案 → 改代码 → 跑测试 → 完成。

正在连接实时推送…

📜 omo 干了哪些事 (按时间)

按时间顺序显示 omo 完成的所有步骤。每个阶段都有详细说明, 可以看到它做了什么、改了哪些文件。

🛠️ 开发过程

结构化的开发时间线, 显示每个阶段的工作内容和成果。
🔍 EXPLORE 375s Sisyphus - ultraworker

读了 1 个 Markdown;工具调用: read ×15, bash ×6, grep ×2, todowrite ×1;read · ses_fef8e3b7af

📁 涉及文件 (1):
  • /home/yi/opencode-blog-showcase/logs/daily-agent-watchdog-2026-08-16.md
🔧 工具调用 (10):
  • read → /home/yi/opencode-blog-showcase/logs/daily-agent-watchdog-20
  • read → /home/yi/opencode-blog-showcase/blog-app/templates/analyze.h
  • read → /home/yi/opencode-blog-showcase/blog-app/templates/project_d
  • bash → stat -c '%Y %n' /home/yi/opencode-blog-showcase/blog-app/scr
  • read → /home/yi/.omo/analyze-watchdog-ui-2026-08-16.md
  • ... 还有 5 次调用

结果: 当前阶段

📤 执行结果

omo 完成任务后留下的产出物: 总结、文档、代码提交等。

📋 任务基本信息

任务的基本属性: 状态、负责人、优先级等。

状态: blocked 🔧 自动重试中: Fork #111 Sisyphus exited cleanly but did NOT produce /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md. All 7 required files were read but LLM got confused mid-step (hallucinated 'user paste' input from accumulated too

负责人: omo-pm

优先级: N/A

工作目录: /home/yi/opencode-blog-showcase/blog-app

创建时间: 2026-08-17 23:56:35

开始时间: 2026-08-17 23:57:36 (12h ago)

📝 任务描述

任务的详细说明, 描述要做什么。
Fork the Sisyphus agent and hand it the brief at /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit-brief.md. Sisyphus must perform a read-only, user-perspective UX audit of the blog-app watchdog feature — do NOT modify any application code. Required output: a single Markdown report at /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md containing: (1) a user-perspective walkthrough covering entry points, triggers, frequency, displayed info, dismiss/ack flows, and realistic edge cases; (2) pain points and friction, each pinned to a concre

📅 这个任务的全部记录 (17 条)

任务生命周期中发生的所有事件, 按时间倒序排列。
2026-08-17 23:56:35 - 📌 任务创建
{"by": "auto-decomposer", "from_decompose_of": "t_80be138f"}
2026-08-17 23:56:35 - linked
{"parent": "t_3a63d8e1", "child": "t_1421ab60"}
2026-08-17 23:57:22 - promoted
2026-08-17 23:57:36 - claimed
{"lock": "abeemax395:2962286", "expires": 1786983156, "run_id": 111}
2026-08-17 23:57:36 - spawned
{"pid": 3634600}
2026-08-17 23:57:36 - heartbeat
2026-08-17 23:58:36 - heartbeat
2026-08-17 23:59:36 - heartbeat
2026-08-18 00:00:36 - heartbeat
2026-08-18 00:01:43 - heartbeat
2026-08-18 00:02:43 - heartbeat
2026-08-18 00:03:43 - heartbeat
2026-08-18 00:04:43 - heartbeat
2026-08-18 00:05:12 - commented
{"author": "omo-pm", "len": 1457}
2026-08-18 00:05:21 - commented
{"author": "omo-pm", "len": 568}
2026-08-18 00:05:21 - 🚫 被阻塞
{"reason": "Fork #111 Sisyphus exited cleanly but did NOT produce /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md. All 7 required files were read but LLM got confused mid-step (hallucinated 'user paste' input from accumulated tool output), then stopped. No app code was modified. Needs retry with revised brief (cap parallel reads at 3-4 OR insert explicit 'write report now using write_file' directive after file reading). Brief at /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit-brief.md is sound; the failure was in LLM context handling not brief content. Full timeline posted in preceding kanban comment.", "kind": "transient", "recurrences": 1, "source_status": "ready"}
2026-08-18 00:05:38 - commented
{"author": "omo-pm", "len": 593}

💬 评论 (3 条)

关于这个任务的讨论和备注。
omo-pm - 2026-08-18 00:05:12
Fork #111 STATUS: Sisyphus exited cleanly but DID NOT produce /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md. Timeline: - 23:57: forked (PID 3635086, log /tmp/omo-t_1421ab60.log) - 23:57-23:59: Sisyphus read brief + 7 required files (base.html, watchdog.html, daily_watchdog.py, sample report md, install_watchdog_cron.sh, project_detail.html, analyze.html) — investigation phase COMPLETE - 00:00: Sisyphus next step opened, LLM responded with confused 'I see you've started pasting data, but it's cut off mid-entry' message - 00:00: step_finish reason=stop — Sisyphus terminated without writing the report Root cause: litellm-local/coding LLM got confused by accumulated tool outputs (8 large file reads in same step) and hallucinated user paste input, then stopped. Not a Sisyphus infra issue — model context confusion. Brief consumed correctly, all investigation work done by Sisyphus is preserved in log. The next fork attempt will need a tighter brief that breaks the 8 parallel reads into 2-3 batches OR includes an explicit 'after reading files, write the report to /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md using write_file' instruction near the start. Acceptance: NO. Report file does not exist at /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md (verified by ls). Recommendation: BLOCK this task. Re-spawn fork with revised brief that constrains parallel read count or adds explicit write step instruction. NOT retrying in-session per omo-pm hard rule (no manual deliverable production).
omo-pm - 2026-08-18 00:05:21
BLOCKED: Fork #111 Sisyphus exited cleanly but did NOT produce /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md. All 7 required files were read but LLM got confused mid-step (hallucinated 'user paste' input from accumulated tool output), then stopped. No app code was modified. Needs retry with revised brief (cap parallel reads at 3-4 OR insert explicit 'write report now using write_file' directive after file reading). Brief at /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit-brief.md is sound; the failure was in LLM context handling not brief content. Full timeline posted in preceding kanban comment.
omo-pm - 2026-08-18 00:05:38
BLOCKED: Re-affirming block in this turn per protocol. Fork #111 outcome: Sisyphus read brief + 7 source files in parallel, then next-step LLM hallucinated 'user paste' input and stopped cleanly without writing /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md. Deliverable absent (verified). No app code modified. mtime baseline at /tmp/t_80be138f-mtime-baseline.txt intact. Recommended retry brief change: cap parallel reads at 3-4 files per batch OR insert explicit 'now use write_file to produce /tmp/blog-watchdog-ux-audit.md' directive between reading and exiting. Awaiting user decision on retry strategy.

🔄 执行记录 (1 次)

omo 执行这个任务的历史记录, 包括每次执行的进程号、状态和结果。
执行 ID 执行者 状态 进程号 开始时间 结束时间 结果
111 omo-pm blocked N/A 2026-08-17 23:57:36 2026-08-18 00:05:21 blocked

📎 附件 (0 个)

任务相关的文件附件。

暂无附件

← 返回任务列表

⚙️ Running Processes

Loading…